Community Proposal for the Annual Treasury Tranche Release of DIA DAO (2025)

Dear DIA Team,
We fully support the team’s proposal for the 2025 treasury release and kind request the addition of 274,500 DIA community airdrop to reward active participants.

**Proposal: Add Community Airdrop of 274,500 DIA Tokens for 2025 **

In the spirit of collaboration and gratitude, we are excited to announce a new proposal for the 2025 Community Airdrop, continuing the tradition from 2022, 2023 and 2024. This initiative seeks to reward and recognize our community support and active participation in governance.

We also emphasize that the requested 274,500 DIA tokens represent a small amount of the overall treasury and will not impact DIA’s operational or strategic objectives. We also expect this to reactivate and grow the community for the future. This airdrop is designed to strengthen community engagement while ensuring that the core business remains unaffected.

Increasing the airdrop to 3% aims to make voting more attractive for new users, attract new community members, and strengthen the role of the community.

We emphasize the equal value of every single vote, regardless of the amount of DIA token held. This is the only way to avoid speculation about whaling practices or the loss of freedom and decentralization.

Key Details of the Proposal

  1. Total Allocation: 274,500 DIA tokens.

  2. Distribution Method:

  • Equal Shares to All Eligible Participants:
    All community members who voted on any DIA proposals during the years 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 will receive an equal share of the airdrop.

  • Data Sources:

    • Eligibility will be determined using voter data from previous airdrops (2022–2024).

    • Additional data for 2025 votes will be retrieved from the Snapshot voting page.

  • Formula:
    Token Allocation =274,500 DIA
    Allocation Per Participant = 274,500 DIA​ / Total Number of Voters

  1. Claim Mechanism:
  • Airdrop tokens will be claimed manually by eligible participants.

  • Details and instructions for claiming will be shared post-approval.

5. Unclaimed airdrop rewards

  • They will not be burned, but will be used for marketing.

Rationale for the Proposal

The annual community airdrop is a hallmark initiative that recognizes and rewards active governance participants. By directly linking rewards to voting activity, the DIA DAO reinforces its commitment to empowering its community and fostering meaningful participation in decision-making processes.

With its minimal impact on the treasury, this proposal ensures transparency, fairness, and continued engagement, while maintaining DIA’s operational efficiency and business growth.


Best regards,
Ahmed

1 Like

Expanding on the topic from the November 30 post on TG DIA, I don’t think this proposal makes sense at this stage of low engagement.

It is also rather naive on the part of some users to create sibyl wallets in order to abuse the team’s incentives.
Below, I will provide the wallet address and a screenshot of the timeframe of the last vote for August 2025.

0xEC1465EE9ABa2890Cc73928816095f1fB40fc699

A Snapshot timeframe indicating clear manipulation by one user or several individuals.

Any user can easily verify this information.
To sum up, what was once a positive initiative has become nothing more than a subject of abuse by sibyls and is of no benefit to either the project or the community.

2 Likes

I support the idea of a 2025 airdrop, but I think the current distribution method needs improvement. The voting-only model has been gamed over the years and no longer reflects true community contribution. It rewards low-effort participation and does not capture the people who actively support the ecosystem.

A stronger approach would be to include on-chain activity as part of the eligibility. Voting on Snapshot is important, but it does not show deeper engagement. Staking on Laser Net does. Users who already committed their DIA on-chain before this proposal showed real alignment, real skin in the game, and long-term interest in DIA’s success.

My suggestion is to add an extra layer to the criteria.

• Keep voting participation.

• Add eligibility for users who were staking on LaserNet before this proposal.

This creates a fairer system that rewards genuine contributors, reduces the impact of farming behavior, and strengthens the network itself through staking participation.

I support the airdrop, but I believe this adjusted model delivers more value to the community and to DIA in the long run.

1 Like

Hello everyone,

A lot has happened throughout 2025, and it’s clear that DIA is becoming stronger, more resilient, and increasingly respected across the Web3 ecosystem. With the successful launch of Lumina and the shift toward a fully trustless, transparent oracle architecture, DIA is entering a new stage of maturity, one that requires stability, focus, and long-term strategic execution.

After reviewing the 2026 treasury proposal, the community i represent is fully aligned with the DIA core team’s position and direction. We support the decision not to introduce any airdrop at this stage.

The rationale is clear:
• DIA is prioritizing adoption, decentralization, and infrastructure scaling rather than short-term incentives.
• Staking has only recently been introduced, and its long-term benefits must be allowed to develop organically.
• Voting participation in 2025 was low, making this an unsuitable moment for any distribution model tied to governance activity.
• The treasury allocation for 2026 is designed to accelerate growth, expand integrations, attract top talent, and strengthen the Lumina ecosystem, not to dilute the token supply through an airdrop.

For these reasons, I and the community behind do not support an airdrop at this moment. Instead, we believe the most sustainable and meaningful approach is to allow DIA’s foundations to solidify through staking, network participation, and consistent governance engagement.
If conditions evolve as expected and the ecosystem grows throughout 2026, we anticipate presenting a large, well-structured, staking-and-voting-based airdrop proposal around Q3 2026 , one that rewards true long-term contributors, strengthens decentralization, and echoes across the broader crypto community.

Until then, we encourage everyone to:
• stake their DIA,
• participate actively in governance,
• and support the continued decentralization of the network.

But, if other users or the broader community feel differently, then a dedicated vote to decide whether an airdrop is desired or not would be the most transparent and fair way forward.

Historical context of latest airdrops:

2022 – Vote-Weighted Airdrop
• Distributed 91,500 DIA to DAO voters based on voting power and holdings.
• Result: whales captured over 50% of the airdrop, leaving smaller participants with minimal rewards.
• Lesson: weighted voting can recognize contribution but can disproportionately favor large holders.

2023–2024 – Equal-Share Model
• Distributed 91,500 DIA equally among all voters from prior years.
• Result: fairer for small holders, practically got a bonus from 2022, but less than 50% of allocated tokens were claimed;
• Now we see that a door is open to sybil wallets and low-effort participation. Thank for your research @AFFKKT .
• Lesson: equal-share distribution improves fairness but needs anti-abuse measures and better engagement criteria.

Observations
• Voting alone is not sufficient to measure meaningful contribution.
• On-chain staking (e.g., LaserNet) now provides an effective metric of commitment + additional bonus if voting. Agree with @Hypolithe


2025 Proposal Analysis from @decent_freedom
• Proposed 274,500 DIA is more than triple previous allocations, which is excessive given low engagement.
• Risks: sybil wallets, exemple given by @AFFKKT , low-effort claiming, disproportionate rewards.
• Historical claim rates show that smaller allocations (~95k DIA) have been sufficient; most unclaimed tokens went to burn.
Conclusion: 274,500 DIA is disproportionate and unjustified for 2025.

Strategic Focus :
• Prioritize development, staking, and community strengthening in 2025-2026
• Prepare for a larger, meaningful airdrop proposal in 2026

What we recommend for later proposals.

Total Allocation: 100,000+ DIA
Base Allocation represent 70,000+ DIA
Bonus Allocation, 30,000+ DIA

Eligibility:
• Only participants who have staked DIA are eligible.
• Minimum stake: 300 DIA.
• Tokens must be staked for at least 3 months.
• Snapshot voting alone is not sufficient, participants must also have staked DIA.


Base Allocation (Staking-Based)
• Calculation:
• Base Allocation per participant = 70,000 DIA / Total eligible participants
• Long-Term Staking Bonus:
o For each month staked beyond 3 months, participant receives +10% per month:
• Base Allocation with Staking Bonus = Base Allocation * (1 + 10% * MonthsBeyond3)
o Example: Staked 5 months → +20% bonus.


Vote-Based Extra Bonus
• Eligibility: Only participants who also voted on Snapshot proposals in 2025-2026.
• Calculation:
• Vote Bonus = (Base Allocation + Staking Bonus) * (5% * Number of votes in 2025-2026)
• Notes:
o Each vote adds 5% to the participant’s total claim.
o Voting alone without staking does not grant any airdrop.


Total Claim
Total Claim = Base Allocation + Staking Bonus + Vote-Based Extra Bonus

Scenario:
Total Base Allocation: 70,000 DIA
Assume 500 eligible participants

• User staked 1,000 DIA for 6 months (minimum 300 DIA → eligible :white_check_mark:)
• Staking Bonus: +10% per month beyond 3 months → 6 - 3 = 3 months → +30%
• User voted 3 times on Snapshot in 2025-2026 → 5% extra per vote

TOTAL CLAIMABLE : 209 DIA
User benefits both from airdrop incentives (staking + voting) and staking APY, making staking highly rewarding.


Summary:
• Rewards genuine, long-term commitment via staking.
• Incentivizes both staking and active governance participation.
• Prevents sybil abuse and excludes participants who only vote without staking.
• Keeps distribution fair and aligned with DIA’s growth strategy.

Once again, If other users or the broader community feel differently, then a dedicated vote to decide whether an airdrop is desired or not would be the most transparent and fair way forward.

Thank you all for your continued support and participation. DIA keeps growing stronger because of this community, and together we can make 2026 a defining year.

My best regards to everyone,
Alex

2 Likes

I agree with all points. This is an excellent and very thoughtful text, thank you.

Thus, all that remains is to implement the Snapshot function, which will allow users to vote based on their tokens on the Lumina Network (Staking).

I would also like to emphasise GDP #018: DIA DAO Annual Treasury Release for 2026, so that this proposal is not combined with the Community Proposal, but voted on separately.

This would allow us to avoid an obvious conflict of interest.

Thank you @decent_freedom for submitting this community proposal and continuing the tradition of community engagement in our governance process. We appreciate the thought behind recognizing active participants and understand the intent to strengthen community involvement.

We also want to acknowledge the thoughtful feedback from @AFFKKT,@Hypolithe, and @alexism. AFFKKT’s documentation of Sybil wallet behavior reinforces concerns we’ve observed across previous airdrops, and Hypolithe’s suggestion to incorporate Lasernet staking activity reflects genuine engagement that goes beyond simple vote participation. Alex’s comprehensive historical analysis and forward-looking framework truly adds valuable context to this discussion.

After careful consideration, the core team cannot support @decent_freedom’s proposal in its current form. We want to share our reasoning transparently so the community understands our perspective.

This year saw minimal governance activity, with only one Snapshot vote on the ZoopX oracle grant approval. The original intent of community airdrops was to incentivize active, ongoing governance engagement and reward meaningful contribution to decision-making. With limited voting opportunities in 2025, an airdrop of this magnitude doesn’t align well with that principle.

The proposed allocation of 274,500 DIA also represents a 3x increase over previous years. Given the reduced governance activity this year, we find this increase challenging to justify from a value-creation standpoint.

We also want to address the eligibility criteria. While equal distribution aims to promote fairness, it creates vulnerabilities we’ve observed in past airdrops - users creating multiple wallets to maximize rewards (as AFFKKT noted, we can see this happened also in the ZoopX vote earlier this year). Additionally, historical data shows significant portions of airdrop tokens remain unclaimed, which represents an inefficient use of treasury resources that could be deployed more strategically.

On the point about attracting new community members: we recognize the appeal of this argument, but the eligibility criteria (previous vote participation) means this airdrop would primarily reward existing participants rather than attract new ones. Looking ahead, designing incentives around one-time token distributions risks attracting airdrop hunters rather than long-term contributors who genuinely care about DIA’s governance and direction.

Regarding Hypolithe’s suggestion to include Lasernet staking criteria: while we appreciate the intent to recognize deeper onchain commitment, stakers are already earning competitive APY (currently ~14.68%). Adding additional airdrop incentives on top of existing staking rewards could create an unnecessarily redundant reward structure. Network security and participation are already being incentivized through the staking mechanism itself.

From our perspective, treasury resources create more lasting value when allocated toward network security through staking incentives, developer grants that expand the ecosystem, and strategic initiatives that position DIA for sustainable growth. These approaches reward long-term alignment and active participation rather than one-time engagement.

We appreciate @alexism’s forward-looking perspective on potential future community rewards that combine staking commitment with governance participation. While we’re not committing to any specific timeline or structure at this stage, we recognize the value in allowing DIA’s staking ecosystem to mature organically throughout 2026 before considering alternative reward mechanisms. The community may well propose refined approaches in the future that better align incentives with long-term contribution.

That said, we deeply respect the community’s right to propose alternatives and make these decisions collectively. All proposals that meet governance guidelines will be included in the Snapshot vote starting Friday, December 5th. The DAO will ultimately decide, and whatever outcome the community chooses, we’ll support the process and respect the result.

We encourage everyone to participate in the vote and make their voice heard.

Best regards,

Anze, Community & DAO Lead at DIA

1 Like

The proposal was added to the Snapshot vote and is labeled under “Community Proposal #1”.

The Snapshot vote is now live.